As a hiring manager, you may be presented with a choice: hire the candidate with the most experience or a natural ability to get things done. While tenure is the indicator of expertise in many careers, the case can be made for hiring based on aptitude versus experience in cybersecurity.
Aptitude Predicts Future Performance while Experience and Skills Show the Ability to Repeat
When it comes to cybersecurity jobs, the only certainty is change. As cybersecurity professionals are constantly forced to adapt to new threats and new tools, they must be imminently improvisational. The ability to demonstrate the capacity to try new things, work with different tools and vendors, and weave together a fluid framework of people, process, and technology beats bullets on a resume every time.
In positions where experience denotes expertise, there’s little variance in performance expectations. A tailor that makes bespoke suits can usually be judged by tenure, as the end product is the same. However, in information security, the expectation is that critical information stays safe despite a constantly evolving threat from anonymous bad guys. Bad actors have to be right once, where defenders have to be perfect 100% of the time. While experience and skills certainly help, aptitude is what keeps the lights on. For the full article click here
from cyber security caucus http://ift.tt/2be13aH
via IFTTT
No comments:
Post a Comment